??
I checked my private copies of draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-00 to
-04, and could not find either the number "192" nor the string "return" in
such a context.
Wrong draft name?
(mandatory reminder: the IETF does not control the content of
internet-drafts..... ANY bad idea can be published as an I-D, and many are)
Harald
--On 6. mars 2005 11:42 +0100 Florian Weimer
<fw(_at_)deneb(_dot_)enyo(_dot_)de> wrote:
* Harald Tveit Alvestrand:
--On 5. mars 2005 13:39 +0100 Florian Weimer
<fw(_at_)deneb(_dot_)enyo(_dot_)de> wrote:
By "special semantics" I mean special stub
resolver or resolver which is triggered by the appearance of some
magic labels or domain names, indepedent of actual zone data. (An
extreme example: "Resolvers MUST return the address 192.0.2.1 for IN A
queries of the name www.example.com.")
query: are you talking about something in a real standards document,
It's draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (which has expired from the
IETF archives apparently).
something encountered in products,
Apple and Novell are currently shipping implementations, causing major
trouble for those trying to use those products on private networks
with their own name/address allocation.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf