from my very humble perspective, it is actually useful to test a -00
draft. The more revisions a draft goes through, the more reticent and
author becomes to change it. Getting the test done early makes that job
easier.
On Jun 10, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
On 6/9/05, Bruce Lilly <blilly(_at_)erols(_dot_)com> wrote:
Conversely, if the IESG does regard the matter as important, it could:
1. direct the IETF Secretariat to enforce the rule
Bruce,
ID-Checklist is only for I-Ds that are submitted to the IESG for
publication. It's not the cost of checking that is a problem, rather,
it's useful to allow earlier drafts of I-Ds to not be fully fleshed
out (thus they're .. well .. drafts?)
Bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
This message was passed through ietf_censored(_at_)carmen(_dot_)ipv6(_dot_)cselt(_dot_)it,
which is a sublist of ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_) Not all messages are passed.
Decisions on what to pass are made solely by IETF_CENSORED ML
Administrator (ietf_admin(_at_)ngnet(_dot_)it).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf