Robert Elz wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:39:37 -0400
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret(_at_)thingmagic(_dot_)com>
Message-ID: <p0620070ebee8c42a0174(_at_)[10(_dot_)0(_dot_)0(_dot_)171]>
| The arguments against what the IESG has done seem,
| mostly, to be that we should have gotten IETF consensus before
| making a decision.
That is absolutely not it.
The argument is that the IESG used the wrong criteria in making
their own decision.
Since neither 2434 nor 2780 lays down any criteria, I don't
understand how to measure "wrong."
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf