"Marshall Eubanks" <tme(_at_)multicasttech(_dot_)com> writes:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:08:45 +0200
Simon Josefsson <jas(_at_)extundo(_dot_)com> wrote:
Brian E Carpenter <brc(_at_)zurich(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> writes:
We propose that, for an initial period of 6 months, a member of
the community will be added to regular IESG meetings as a "recording
secretary" who will write narrative minutes of the discussions,
which will be posted publicly after IESG review for accuracy.
Sounds useful to me. How about actually recording the discussion too?
And publishing them as OGG or MP3. Editing out personnel discussion
would still be possible. All for the sake of transparency and
accountability.
My experience is that recordings tend to shut some people up.
My experience is that recordings tend to make people focus on facts,
rather than trying to win a discussion or furthering their own agenda.
If the IESG meetings are intended as service to the community, from
experts, that seem to be a good thing.
Plus, if they exist, they are subject to subpoena.
Is that a problem? Not purely a rhetorical question.
Thanks,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf