I think the concept of separating the responsibility for final document
review and approval from the responsibility for chartering and managing
working workings.
Yes, there are some tricky details. But it looks like they are solvable
and the approach leads to improvement in several regards.
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
At 06:09 AM 8/4/2005, John C Klensin wrote:
See my note posted a short time ago (which was written before seeing
yours). But, yes. This is exactly the thing I was commenting about in
that note. It is, at some level, a detail. It can be tuned in any of a
number of ways. I picked one, not quite at random. You suggest a
different one above. I think we need to decide the concept is worthwhile
(I'm not sure there is consensus on that yet), and then sort through these
details. IMO, the "I don't like that detail so the proposal is invalid and
should not be considered" approach is just not a productive way to proceed.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf