John C Klensin <john dash ietf at jck dot com> wrote:
Then an instruction to the RFC Editor could be included in the
I-D asking that they not publish the initialization document
until the entries have been made in the IANA registry and then
that the list of entries be dropped and replaced with a pointer
paragraph and reference. That would lead to an RFC that was
clearly informational and fairly short, saving everyone
long-term problems.
The whole purpose of draft-initial is to serve as the vehicle by which
the initial registry contents are transmitted to IANA. That was what
the co-chairs and group thought best. There would be no need for a
separate initialization document otherwise.
--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf