On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)62(_dot_)0509081359170(_dot_)17352(_at_)sokol(_dot_)elan(_dot_)net>,
"william(at)elan
.net" writes:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Dave Crocker wrote:
[Note: Not very long ago, I argued persuasively to a large and broad
movement within the IETF seeking to have the IETF adopt an anti-patent
position.
my memory is slipping worse that I thought.
i don't recall seeing evidence of the community's being persuaded.
It wasn't -- he's wrong.
I see: I'm wrong, but you didn't see the original note. How thorough of
you. Sounds more like: "Crocker is right, no matter what".
Wearing my IPR WG hat and citing a product of that WG...
Maybe if you are going to make official statements, you could do a more
thorough job of consulting both the statements being made, and your RFCs.
I just cited RFC3979, a more recent product of your working group. But
nothing I said was in contradiction to RFC3669, either. Not that you
bothered to read it before commenting.
[Didn't I just say something about fabrication of statements and
professional dishonesty...]
--Dean
--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf