Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic)

ietf

Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic)

2006-01-11 14:51:35


On Jan 10, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

Lucy, I suspect that they merely were making a spelling error,since I'm sure they were referring to folk who are truly essential,and therefore qualify as linch pins...

I have never heard of a linching party. RFCs filled with base64encoded images may invite an en masse response however.. : )


-Doug

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Accessibility of Documents, Sam Hartman Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Spencer Dawkins Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), John C Klensin Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Lucy E. Lynch Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Dave Crocker Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Spencer Dawkins Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Douglas Otis <=

Previous by Date:	RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Bob Braden
Next by Date:	RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:	Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Spencer Dawkins
Next by Thread:	Re: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), Bob Braden
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]