Brian E Carpenter wrote:
A practice I used when I was diffserv chair and we had quite a lot
of off-topic postings was to create a second list, diffserv-interest
(which still exists BTW). The rule for diffserv(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org was "must
be relevant to a chartered work item" and the rule for diffserv-interest
was "must be relevant to diffserv technology."
Though I never participated in diffserv WG activities, which was
chartered wrongly from the beginning, your chairing strategy
explains why the result of the WG is technically meaningless.
People only interested
in the standards work simply ignored the -interest list.
They ignored the -interest list and the technology.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf