Re: [Gen-art] GenArt LC review of DHCP Server Identifier Override Subopt

John,

Both valid comments, which are in the tracker, but #1 is
explicitly not a DISCUSS (see the 5th bullet of section 3.2
of http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/discuss-criteria.html).

Thanks

    Brian

john(_dot_)loughney(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com wrote:
> I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this
> specification (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-03.tx
> t
>
> My feeling is that this document needs some revision, at least to cover
> the IANA section, and perhaps my point raised about the introduction.
>
> 1) Intro says:
>
>    There are many situations where the DHCP relay is involved and can
>    insert a relay agent option with appropriate suboptions easily into
>    DHCP DISCOVER messages.  
>
> Of course, this begs the question - what are those situations?  Anyhow,
> I think the intro is a bit short on motivation for this suboption.
>
> 2) IANA Section says:
>
> 5.  IANA Considerations
>
>    IANA is requested to assign a suboption number for the Server
>    Identifier Override Suboption from the DHCP Relay Agent Information
>    Option [3] suboption number space.  None.
>
>
> I don't understand what the 'None.' refers to.
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf