Hi,
I also like this suggestion. Not much to add, I agree with Frank's
comments.
The third paragraph of section 2.2 seems to have missing something
around the last sentence..
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Internet-Drafts(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org wrote:
Title : IETF Process and Operations Documents
Author(s) : H. Alvestrand
Filename : draft-alvestrand-ipod-00.txt
Yes, I like this, admin and procedural stuff as new series,
not mixed with more technical BCPs or informational RfCs.
It goes even further saying that "IPODs" are no RfCs at all,
but ordinary Web pages (in formats defined by an "IPOD").
I don't see why new formats are strictly necessary, a text
I-D translated to HTML by <http://tools.ietf.org/html> is
typically fine, it offers links and up to 100 versions, e.g.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-ipod
The "IPOD" acronym is a bit odd, how about "CAP" (current
administrative procedures) ?
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf