I need to add a point of information regarding "assisted" in the text
below. I insisted that the solution support multiple name forms and
that the solution include a backward compatible mechanism as new name
forms are registered. I did offer some guidance during AD Review to
ensure that these properties were included.
Russ
At 01:35 PM 3/20/2006, Stefan Santesson wrote:
<Stefan> We can't define a new user mapping type just to have one more.
There has to be a use case with a need for one. The current hint can be
used with a wide set of account names in practically any environment
that use the principles of user(_at_)domain(_dot_)
But the extensibility is there in case a new need is there in the
future.
The security AD (Russ) has assisted in developing that part of the
document.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf