May I suggest a different set of questions, on the "independent" list?
Instead of arguing about what the RFC Editor is, or who created,
defines, or controls it, lets try to figure out whether we need to
change the current situation, and if so what changes we need to make.
1) Does John Klensin's draft accurately describe what we are
currently doing? I believe so.
2) Do the small changes he proposes to have done make
sense? Primarily, those seem to relate providing an appeals path.
3) Are their other changes to the current situation we would like to make?
Lets not arguing about what goes in which contract, or whose pocket
the money comes from.
Please.
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf