On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:48:28AM -0700, todd glassey wrote:
So Thomas - Is this a NOT SO SUBTLE form of harassment?.
Well, given that Thomas posts the "Weekly posting summary" for the
IETF list every week, you can't make the claim that this was
personally directed at you. You only have you to blame that you are
personally responsible for over one-quarter of the IETF list traffic.
That being said, we have received complaints that your posts besides
being voluminous, are off-topic and/or have not been adding much if
any value to the discussion.
May I suggest that you try to stop and think about whether the
messages you send are true, necessary, and kind, and whether waiting
24 hours before pressing the send button and perhaps doing an editing
pass to combine e-mail messages and combine them to create a higher
signal-to-noise ratio, might cause you to be perceived as better
member of this community?
One of your friendly Sergeants-At-Arms,
- Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Narten" <narten(_at_)us(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 5:56 AM
Subject: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Total of 122 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Jul 28 00:03:02 EDT 2006
Messages | Bytes | Who
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
26.23% | 32 | 26.08% | 250016 | tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net
10.66% | 13 | 10.48% | 100481 | john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com
7.38% | 9 | 5.77% | 55362 | touch(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu
6.56% | 8 | 5.44% | 52194 | brc(_at_)zurich(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com
0.82% | 1 | 9.63% | 92362 | alh-ietf(_at_)tndh(_dot_)net
5.74% | 7 | 4.05% | 38848 | dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net
3.28% | 4 | 5.26% | 50443 | jefsey(_at_)jefsey(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf