ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Two other RFCs to be published as Historic (was Re: Expedited Handling Request for draft-ietf-ltru-registry, draft-ietf-ltru-matching, and draft-ietf-ltru-initial)

2006-08-23 07:01:59
At 09:50 23/08/2006, Brian Carpenter wrote:
The IESG requests the RFC Editor  to expedite processing for
draft-ietf-ltru-registry (BCP), draft-ietf-ltru-matching (BCP)
and draft-ietf-ltru-initial (Informational).

The reason is that Unicode wishes to refer to draft-ietf-ltru-registry
in the forthcoming Unicode 5.0 standard within the next few
weeks. The target date is September 10.

Dear Brian,
In case you do not know: the IESG has published yesterday the intent of the Unicode Members and Unicode Member employees making the co-Chair and most of the active part of the WG-LTRU to deprecate these very draft-ietf-ltru-registry and draft-ietf-ltru-registry I-Ds by September and to get them approved by the IESG four months later on.

At 16:23 22/08/2006, IESG Secretary wrote:
A modified charter has been submitted for the Language Tag Registry
Update (ltru) working group in the Applications Area of the IETF.

Goals and Milestones:

September 2006 Submit first WG draft of registry procedure update
September 2006 Submit first WG draft of registry data update
January 2007 Submit registry procedure update draft for IETF Last Call
January 2007 Submit registry data update draft for IETF Last Call

Publishing historic RFCs seems to become a common practice nowadays.
jfc


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Two other RFCs to be published as Historic (was Re: Expedited Handling Request for draft-ietf-ltru-registry, draft-ietf-ltru-matching, and draft-ietf-ltru-initial), Jefsey_Morfin <=