ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to ...

2006-10-24 11:54:09
Scott Bradner wrote:
I agree with John K lets purge 2418, 3683 etc of any language that appears to limit enforcement options and work things out on a case by case basis

Just to be clear, the intention of sections 1 and 2 of
draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-03 is to remove the limitations
on 2418 inadvertently introduced by 3934.

That is quite separable logically from rescinding 3683;
hence the form of Sam's questions.

   Brian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>