On Nov 14, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 4:17 PM +0100 11/14/06, Joe Abley wrote:
For the benefit of those who do not follow dnsext closely, what
friction do you expect?
As Eric stated in his message, we should not rehash old arguments.
This has been beaten to death on the DKIM WG mailing list. As
expected, different people had different (and, in this case,
strongly-held) views, but consensus was reached and agreed to by
the AD and with the DNS folks.
To avoid repeating this debate, can someone post some summary
information on this particularly including which exact people came to
consensus about this. I'm particularly interested in if the consensus
included the contributors to draft-iab-dns-choices since that has
been raised in LC comments.
Thanks, Cullen
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html