ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-hip-mm-04.txt

2007-02-06 00:25:29
Thomas,

yes, you're right.  I'm fine with the SHOULD, in particular because the
MM spec does not preclude the Preferred locator to be in DEPRECATED
state.  Although this would be the case in corner cases only, of course.

Regards,
- Christian

-- 
Christian Vogt, Institute of Telematics, Universitaet Karlsruhe (TH)
www.tm.uka.de/~chvogt/pubkey/



Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
The main problem in using NOTIFY as a MUST is that the NOTIFY parameter
is defined as being optional in the base spec.  I think that if we agree
that we want a MUST, we will have to define a more explicit and reliable
way to reject the locator, such as a LOCATOR_FAILURE parameter in the
UPDATE.

Tom


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>