ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Tag MIB) to Proposed Standard

2007-02-14 23:59:07
Hi -

From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald(_at_)sharplabs(_dot_)com>
Sent: Feb 11, 2007 4:15 AM
To: 'John Cowan' <cowan(_at_)ccil(_dot_)org>, Doug Ewell 
<dewell(_at_)adelphia(_dot_)net>
Cc: ietf-languages(_at_)iana(_dot_)org, LTRU Working Group 
<ltru(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>, ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Ta     
g MIB) to Proposed Standard

Hi,

Right - ASN.1 doesn't allow discontinuous integer ranges.
...

No.  In a SIZE qualifier, a discontiguous range is perfectly
legal ASN.1   There are examples of this in RFC 2579,
among others.  In this particular case, something like

SYNTAX      OCTET STRING (SIZE (0 | 2..60))

(replacing 60 with whatever the consensus upper bound
should be) would seem appropriate.

Randy

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Tag MIB) to Proposed Standard, Randy Presuhn <=