Hi -
From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald(_at_)sharplabs(_dot_)com>
Sent: Feb 11, 2007 4:15 AM
To: 'John Cowan' <cowan(_at_)ccil(_dot_)org>, Doug Ewell
<dewell(_at_)adelphia(_dot_)net>
Cc: ietf-languages(_at_)iana(_dot_)org, LTRU Working Group
<ltru(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>, ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Ta
g MIB) to Proposed Standard
Hi,
Right - ASN.1 doesn't allow discontinuous integer ranges.
...
No. In a SIZE qualifier, a discontiguous range is perfectly
legal ASN.1 There are examples of this in RFC 2579,
among others. In this particular case, something like
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0 | 2..60))
(replacing 60 with whatever the consensus upper bound
should be) would seem appropriate.
Randy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf