Hannes,
I haven't had time to go through these items either, much less time
to compare them against the wglc comments from both GEOPRIV and
RADEXT (https://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2006/msg00698.html). If
these are new issues, it is unsettling that they did not surface
during the cross-area review.
-andy
On Mar 1, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes wrote:
Hi Bernard,
I received your review. I need more time to process it given its
length.
In fact the length of your review surprised me a bit given the long
(>16 months) discussion we already had about the document.
Ciao
Hannes
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Bernard Aboba [mailto:bernard_aboba(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. März 2007 06:45
An: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Betreff: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo
(Carrying LocationObjects in RADIUS
This is a repost of 2 messages previously sent to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org list
which did not make it to the list. They are being re-sent
here at the
request of the RAI ADs.
~snip~
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf