ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

AW: IETF last call on RADIUS GEOPRIV Document

2007-05-22 07:12:08
Hi Dan, 


Please find below my comments:

1. The IETF LC mentions only the DOWNREF for RFC 3576. 
However, there is
another DOWNREF for RFC 2866 which is not mentioned in the LC. 
2. Reference [1] fails to name the RFC number (2119)
Good catch.


3. It would be useful to include expansion of the acronyms at first
occurrence, even if they are borrowed from RADIUS documents. 
For example
NAS. 
OK. 


4. There is a formatting issue (empty or non-aligned bullet) 
in Section
5.8 at page 27

OK 

5. The contact persons for experts in external organizations TADIG and
REALM are mentioned by their personal e-mail address in the table in
Section 11.1. This is not appropriate for an RFC. If TADIG or REALM
cannot provide a semi-permanent alias for their nominated 
experts, there
should be at least some text that mentions that the addresses 
belong to
the nominated experts at the date of the approval of the 
document and if
these addresses are no longer available readers are directed 
to TADIG or
REALM. 

I will add the contact persons for TADIG and REALM. 

Ciao
Hannes


Dan


 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext(_at_)ops(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:owner-radiusext(_at_)ops(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Bernard 
Aboba
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 10:17 PM
To: radiusext(_at_)ops(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: IETF last call on RADIUS GEOPRIV Document

The IESG has received a request from the Geographic 
Location/Privacy WG
(geopriv) to consider the following document:

- 'Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS '
   <draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-10.txt> as a Proposed Standard

This draft has a downref to RFC 3576 but 3576 is only used 
for an optional feature of "Mid-session Authorization".

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and 
solicits final comments on this action.  Please send 
substantive comments to the ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 
2007-02-19. Exceptionally,  comments may be sent to iesg at 
ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning 
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-
lo-10.txt

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie
w_id&dTag=12340&rfc_flag=0



--
to unsubscribe send a message to 
radiusext-request(_at_)ops(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org with the word 'unsubscribe' 
in 
a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • AW: IETF last call on RADIUS GEOPRIV Document, Tschofenig, Hannes <=