Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500,
Russ Housley <housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com> wrote
a message of 31 lines which said:
Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC. This remedy
is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do it.
Is it to test the future procedure that RFC 4390 is no longer
downloadable? :-)
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt
Forbidden
Syephane - you get the same thing when you go to
http://www.ietf.org/rfc.html
or any RFC for that matter. I think there is a configuration problem
with the server.
cheers
joe baptista
You don't have permission to access /rfc/rfc4390.txt on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an
ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server at www.ietf.org Port 80
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Joe Baptista www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
----------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Office: +1 (202) 517-1593
Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
baptista.vcf
Description: Vcard
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf