--On Friday, 28 March, 2008 11:38 +1100 Mark Andrews
<Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org> wrote:
OTOH, I think standardizing this convention makes all sorts
of sense, but not, of course, in 2821bis.
Why not in 2821bis? Is 2821bis really that time critical?
It is on its way to Draft Standard. This would be a
sufficiently new feature to force recycle at Proposed, which, to
put it mildly, would not be welcomed by the editor or, more
important, those who convinced me to do the work.
john
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf