ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on therecent ICANN changes?)

2008-07-07 09:47:50
At 9:25 AM -0700 7/7/08, michael(_dot_)dillon(_at_)bt(_dot_)com wrote:
However, many concepts in modern Chinese
dialects require multiple syllables to express them and
therefore multiple characters to write them. So there isn't
really a one to one mapping of word, syllable, concept as
many people suppose.

While there may not be a one-to-one mapping of word,
character, and concept every time, there are many words
and concepts which can be given (and commonly given)
in a single character.  Forcing  those to use multiple characters
to get around a policy limitation may introduce, rather than reduce confusion. 

Why would we want to insist on that?
                                Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>