On a related note, I'd like to make sure that you guys know that, as we
discussed in Dublin, the P4P Working Group is in the process of documenting the
P4P protocol as used in our field tests, which we would like to offer to the
ALTO group as input into the ALTO process. Our hope is to have this ready for
the next IETF meeting.
- Laird Popkin, CTO, Pando Networks
mobile: 646/465-0570
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa(_dot_)dusseault(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
To: "Lakshminath Dondeti" <ldondeti(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com>
Cc: p2pi(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, "IESG IESG" <iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>,
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 3:21:02 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
Lakshminath and Vidya,
Vijay, Enrico and Stefano have said what I was going to say (e.g. below) -- as
sponsoring AD for this charter I've been following the WG discussion, working
with the rest of the IESG, and talking to people to confirm that there's better
consensus on the list, even if there was confusion at the BOF. This IETF Last
Call is also part of confirming whether there's now consensus.
It's difficult to write a charter without actually designing the solution. What
would help with the charter, even now, is for people to write up proposals for
the solution -- ideally in the form of Internet-Drafts. I haven't yet selected
chairs for the WG, so as you can imagine editors and authors aren't yet
selected. It would be most excellent to see some individual proposals before a
committee gets their hands on them :)
Lisa
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani <
vkg(_at_)alcatel-lucent(_dot_)com > wrote:
...
And since the BoF, much has changed to narrow the scope of the
charter down to more manageable pieces as well as establish a
channel with IRTF to move certain aspects of the work there
(as the timeline in my previous email indicated.)
Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
My perception and my understanding of some of the dissenting opinions
was that some of those need to be worked out before creating a working group.
But I believe that we have done exactly that: the list has been
busy since Dublin on attempts to move the work forward in a manner
that is conducive to all participants.
_______________________________________________ p2pi mailing list
p2pi(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf