ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mif] WG Review: Multiple InterFaces (mif)

2009-04-23 13:11:21
Without addressing both issues, the user or application (or transport layer) 
can't utilize simultaneous networks. Thererfore, as far as I know, MIF tries to 
adress real-world problems for the network circumastances, it shoud adress both 
problems, preferably, as separate topics in the same group. Otherwise, a 
working group may need to address best common practice for simultaneous network 
utilization, but I think MIF should be the group though.

Giyeong 
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
 

----- Original Message -----
From: mif-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <mif-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; MIF Mailing List 
<mif(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wed Apr 22 19:07:16 2009
Subject: Re: [mif] WG Review: Multiple InterFaces (mif)

Excerpts from Christian Vogt on Wed, Apr 22, 2009 04:03:39PM -0700:
My main point, though, was that we are talking about two orthogonal
issues -- conflicting configuration and address selection.  This
holds independently of the fact that an application may let the
operating system accomplish part or all of address selection.

Whether we take this to mean that both issues should be tackled in
the same working group is a different story.  I personally don't see
the orthogonality of the two issues as a reason not to tackle both
issues in the same working group.  We just ought to be aware that
the issues are separate, and the charter should describe them as
such.  This said, there might be work-load- or work-scope-specific
reasons that suggest splitting the work into separate working
groups, like those brought up by Lars, Sam, and Scott.  Those
arguments should be discussed as well.

Exactly.  Thanks.
_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
mif(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission 
by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [mif] WG Review: Multiple InterFaces (mif), Giyeong Son <=