Nelson:
> The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
> the following document:
>
> - 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
> RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
>
> No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call. However, the
> Last Call failed to highlight two normative references to standards track
> documents of lower maturity: RFCs 3280 and 3281.
lower maturity?
Did you perhaps mean "greater maturity" or "lower number" ?
... at a lower rung on the standards-track maturity ladder.
Russ
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf