I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-ms-pw-arch-06.txt
Reviewer: Scott Brim
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date: 2009-06-16
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
- In this one paragraph:
Note that although Figure 4 only shows a single S-PE, a PW may
transit more one S-PE along its path. This architecture is
applicable when the S-PEs are statically chosen, or when they are
chosen using a dynamic path selection mechanism. Both directions
of an MS-PW must traverse the same set of S-PEs on a reciprocal
path. Note that although the S-PE path is therefore reciprocal,
the path taken by the PSN tunnels between the T-PEs and S-PEs may
not be reciprocal due to choices made by the PSN routing protocol.
... "reciprocal" is used, but nowhere else in the document. Should
it be "bi-directional" (used elsewhere)?
- 15.1 "References" should be "Normative References"
Scott
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf