I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-hollenbeck-rfc4933bis-02
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 13 July 2009
IESG Telechat date: 16 July 2009
Summary:
The draft is ready for publication. However, I have a couple of minor
comments about the implementation report at http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/RFCs3730-3734_implem.txt
that may relate to the progression to draft standard.
(I apologize for not making these comments sooner--this is the first
progression to draft that I have reviewed, and only recently had
thoughts on the implementation report.)
Major issues:
None.
Minor issues:
I have a a couple comments about the implementation report. I do not
necessarily consider them blocking issues; I bring them up merely for
consideration.
-- The implementation report refers to RFC and draft versions that are
(at least) a couple of generations old. I assume that the authors
believe that they also apply to this draft, but it would be good to
have an explicit assertion of that.
-- It would help to have an explicit assertion whether the report
author believes the standard meets the requirements to progress to
draft. I think the report implies a "yes", but it leaves the reader to
draw that conclusion.
Nits/editorial comments:
None
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf