Hi,
I also fully agree with Steve. I wrote similar thoughts in the survey.
Regards,
Wassim H.
________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of Simon Perreault [simon(_dot_)perreault(_at_)viagenie(_dot_)ca]
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 21:18
To: Steve Crocker
Cc: IAOC IAOC; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future
meeting of the IETF
On Saturday 19 September 2009 15:55:55 Steve Crocker wrote:
The choice is between engaging and not engaging. Engaging is better.
Not engaging isn't constructive.
Thank you. I wanted to say this, but could not find the right words.
I fully agree with Steve Crocker.
In the long run, exposure to and participation in the IETF might even prove
beneficial to the Chinese.
Thanks,
Simon
--
DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf