ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req (MPLS TP Network Management Requirements) to Proposed Standard

2009-09-22 14:27:11
Hi Ben,

Basically I want to understand whether PID is required for OAM or not? Also is 
OAM a type of MCC traffic?

Thanks,
Shahram 

-----Original Message-----
From: benjamin(_dot_)niven-jenkins(_at_)bt(_dot_)com 
[mailto:benjamin(_dot_)niven-jenkins(_at_)bt(_dot_)com] 
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:32 PM
To: Shahram Davari; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf-announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req (MPLS TP Network 
Management Requirements) to Proposed Standard

Sharam,

The draft describes network management requirements and at most states that OAM 
must be configurable by network management. It presupposes nothing about the 
OAM mechanism used or now the individual network elements (LSRs) recognise the 
OAM packets themselves. So I don't understand your question in regards to the 
draft as the question you ask is not relevant within the scope of the draft.

Ben

________________________________________
From: mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On 
Behalf Of Shahram Davari [davari(_at_)broadcom(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 12:24 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; IETF-Announce
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req (MPLS TP Network 
Management Requirements) to Proposed Standard

Hi,

Just for clarification, does this draft require using a PID for BFD and 
LSP-ping? If not how are the various OAM types identified?

Thanks,
Shahram

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:54 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req (MPLS TP Network 
Management Requirements) to Proposed Standard

The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:

- 'MPLS TP Network Management Requirements '
   <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2009-10-05. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18244&rfc_flag=0

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>