Hi Ben,
Basically I want to understand whether PID is required for OAM or not? Also is
OAM a type of MCC traffic?
Thanks,
Shahram
-----Original Message-----
From: benjamin(_dot_)niven-jenkins(_at_)bt(_dot_)com
[mailto:benjamin(_dot_)niven-jenkins(_at_)bt(_dot_)com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:32 PM
To: Shahram Davari; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf-announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req (MPLS TP Network
Management Requirements) to Proposed Standard
Sharam,
The draft describes network management requirements and at most states that OAM
must be configurable by network management. It presupposes nothing about the
OAM mechanism used or now the individual network elements (LSRs) recognise the
OAM packets themselves. So I don't understand your question in regards to the
draft as the question you ask is not relevant within the scope of the draft.
Ben
________________________________________
From: mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of Shahram Davari [davari(_at_)broadcom(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 12:24 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; IETF-Announce
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req (MPLS TP Network
Management Requirements) to Proposed Standard
Hi,
Just for clarification, does this draft require using a PID for BFD and
LSP-ping? If not how are the various OAM types identified?
Thanks,
Shahram
-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:54 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req (MPLS TP Network
Management Requirements) to Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'MPLS TP Network Management Requirements '
<draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2009-10-05. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18244&rfc_flag=0
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf