ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

2010-01-28 04:23:38
Martin Rex wrote:

I have never seen an IETF AD fight so passionately for the
addition of rfc-2119-violating and unreasonable imperatives into
a document such as Pasi is doing it now.

"Now"? "Addition"? 

I would like to remind you that version -01 of the document also 
very clearly prohibited sending the SCSV in secure renegotiation
ClientHello, and also used upper-case RFC 2119 keywords in that text.

Best regards,
Pasi
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf