I've come across a RFC which basically says, "in order to do X safely,
perform checks Y before you do X". It turns out that it's possible to
evade those checks. What should I do about it? I've already
contacted the author, and he says that no update to the RFC is
planned. Should i just file an errata? The problem is not really
critical, fortunately.
(The nature of the protocol makes it pretty much impossible to notify
implementers privately.)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf