Dear Eve,
Thanks for your review.
I think you are actually right. We cannot say that the protocol is
(already) defined. But we should indicate that such a protocol should be
defined as part of the work on linear protection.
We will fix the text accordingly.
Best regards,
Nurit
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
ext Varma, Eve L (Eve)
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:15 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk
(MultiprotocolLabel Switching Transport Profile Survivability
Framework)to Informational RFC
Dear editors,
In reviewing draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk, I noticed that in Section
4.7.4, Triggers for the Linear Protection Switching Action, the next to
the last paragraph includes a reference to a solution that is work in
progress. Specifically, see italicized text below -
In order to achieve 50ms protection switching it is recommended to
use in-band data-plane driven signaling protocol to coordinate the
protection states. An in-band data-plane PSC (Protection State
Coordination) protocol is defined in [MPLS-TP-Linear-Protection] for
this purpose. This protocol is also used to detect mismatches
between the configuration provisioned at the ends of the Protection
Domain.
Given draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection is a work in progress - and
not a pre-existing protocol, I do not believe it is appropriate to
reference it from within the framework document. Thus, I propose that
the italicized sentences be deleted.
With best regards,
Eve
-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
The IESG
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:03 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk (Multiprotocol
Label Switching Transport Profile Survivability Framework) to
Informational RFC
The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching
WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile Survivability
Framework '
<draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk-05.txt> as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2010-05-06. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case,
please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk-05.tx
t
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=
18472&rfc_flag=0
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf