I can not see why this draft is needed other than making MITM attacks easier. I
request that this not proceed until we can figure out what is going to happen
to draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch then decide if these changes to MSRP are
needed or if the existing mechanism are sufficient.
On Jun 7, 2010, at 8:39 AM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the SIP for Instant Messaging and
Presence Leveraging Extensions WG (simple) to consider the following document:
- 'An Alternative Connection Model for the Message Session Relay Protocol
(MSRP) '
<draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2010-06-21. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case,
please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm-09.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18161&rfc_flag=0
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
Cullen Jennings
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf