ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Fwd: Re: Question - Can DNSSEC be operated in a manner which meets Khaledmandates?

2010-07-21 15:10:30
 oooops...

T

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Question - Can DNSSEC be operated in a manner which meets
Khaledmandates?
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:09:10 -0700
From:   todd glassey <tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net>
To:     Dan Schutzer <dan(_dot_)schutzer(_at_)fstc(_dot_)org>
CC:     dan(_at_)fsround(_dot_)org



 On 7/21/2010 1:02 PM, Dan Schutzer wrote:
Todd

Can you briefly explain the relationship of Red Light Camera's to
DNSSEC?


Sure - the relationship is for "any unattended device intended to offer
evidence of something to a court which could be used in a criminal
prosecution". 

What that means is any and all DNSSEC records operated out of a Root or
lower level system in the state of California who would operate under
these rules will need to meet the "legal definitions of trustworthy"
which are much different that those here I am betting.

Todd
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
todd glassey
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:56 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Question - Can DNSSEC be operated in a manner which meets
Khaledmandates?

 Folks - there is a Court Ruling from the 4th Appellate District which
is turning off Red Light Camera's everywhere and there is a question as
to whether that ruling would also effect how Secure DNS Services are run
and if so what would it do.

The ruling is called California v Khaled and is getting significant
traction here in the State of California in all courts.

Todd

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>