ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IESG position on NAT traversal and IPv4/IPv6

2010-11-15 06:08:07
FWIW, I think that we should provide NAT traversal in the protocols that we develop (or as a part of some more general toolbox that the protocols employ). This is important, and some protocols have been hurt by not having such support initially. NAT/FW traversal is also important even with IPv6, as you may have a firewall even in IPv6 (or be going through a NAT64).

Jari

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf