Earlier, Paul Hoffman wrote in reply to Rene Struik:
The changes you propose have serious IPR considerations
that are not present in the current document. If you want
to propose IPR-laden optimizations, it is better to do so
as a separate document so implementers can see the differences
easily.
+1
Also, it is important to keep any proposed changes separate
so that the IETF can clearly understand the IPR implications
of those proposed changes (e.g., those proposed by Rene Struik).
IMHO, the IETF should avoid IPR issues where that is possible
and practical.
Yours,
Ran
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf