On Nov 24, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
While section 2.3 of draft-iab-extension-recs-02 can be read as very vaguely
pointing away from this kind of extension ("[S]pecifications that look very
similar to the original but don't interoperate with each other or with the
original - are even more harmful to interoperability than extensions"), it
appears to be aimed more squarely at the creation of protocol profiles by
SDOs other than the IETF.
well, we could discuss the use of an IETF session setup protocol for instant
messaging, and the use of a protocol designed to add attributes and report on
available bandwidth within a class of traffic on a standard (eg, calculated by
a routing protocol) route to install a route. We do it to ourselves as well.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf