Active is fine, turned on And always on have different meanings however.
I think we can fix appendix a with the appropriate informative reference as
specified.
Joel's widget number 2
On Nov 28, 2010, at 7:39, "Roni Even"
<ron(_dot_)even(_dot_)tlv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi,
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.
Document: draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2010-11-28
IETF LC End Date: 2010-12-3
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. There
are some nits and minor issue.
Major issues:
Minor issues: The example in appendix A are using syntax with no reference.
The text says that this is non normative text but I think that it will be
good to have a reference to the document where the correct syntax is specified
Nits/editorial comments:
1. The first sentence of section 1 "Modern router architecture design
maintains a strict separation of forwarding and routing control plane
hardware and software." Talks about routing control plane while the next
sentence and the rest of the document calls it "router control plane"
2. In section 2 third paragraph "Additionally, there may be other vendor
or implementation specific protection mechanisms that are on by default or
always on. ". I suggest changing the text "are on" and "always on" maybe to
"active" or "turned on".
Thanks
Roni Even
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf