Roni,
thank you for your review and please apologize my delayed response.
I agree to your comments, the 2. one is really a good catch!
Thank you,
Karl
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org im Auftrag von Roni Even
Gesendet: Sa 12/4/2010 4:41
An: 'General Area Review Team';
draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: 'IETF-Discussion list'
Betreff: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary
Hi,
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-04
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2010-12-04
IETF LC End Date: 2010-12-14
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC. There are
some nits
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
1. In the abstract the document starts with LoST, Please expand to
Location-to-Service Translation
2. At the end of section 3.2 in the note, I think that the first
"getServiceListBoundary" should be " getServiceBoundary"
Roni Even
ATT00001.txt
Description: ATT00001.txt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf