+1
--On Friday, January 07, 2011 09:15 -0500 Andrew Sullivan
<ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'm not keen to start a language war, but. . .
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:39:37AM +0200, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
wrote:
Moreover, 'obsoleted' means the same as 'deprecated' or
'non-current' (see
http://www.synonym.com/synonyms/obsolete/ or
http://dictionary.sensagent.com/obsolete/en-en/#synonyms). So
it is a problem in RFC2026.
. . .I fully disagree with that, regardless of what those
claims of synonymy say. To deprecate something is to express
disapproval. To mark something as obsolete doesn't do that;
it merely says that the marked thing is outdated. There is a
useful distinction here worth maintaining.
A
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf