ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (InternetAssigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Managementof the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port NumberRegistry) to BCP

2011-01-27 12:12:04
On 2011-1-27, at 18:58, t.petch wrote:
And what happens when we have ProtocolX over SSH and ProtocolX over TLS?

Must they share a port, with ProtocolX, which has been quietly using its
assigned port for
20 years?

No. The expert reviewer can obviously assign a second port in that case (if 
ProtocolX doesn't have a feature negotiation capability built in so that the 
port could be shared.)

But we don't want to allocate multiple ports for the different security flavors 
of *new* protocols. At least we want this to be the exception.

The expert team is (from what I hear) seeing frequent applications that look 
like "Hi, we're company X and our foo protocol runs on TCP. We'd like a port 
for that, and one for when we run foo over TLS."

Lars

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>