Re: conformance languages (issue 278), was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpb

> I agree that this needs tuning; but I'd rather not invent a new keyword for
> that.
Sensible.

> The appendix D
> (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.html#rfc.section.D>)
> isn't meant to be normative; thus I believe leaving it the way it is ought
> to be ok.
OK.

> With respect to
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.html#rfc.section.4.3>,
> I believe we really should say "SHOULD" in all the three last items:
It all works for me.  Thanks, and again, I'm sorry to pipe in late.

Barry
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf