RE: Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and datatra

[Copying the RFC Editor to let them also check their records]

Note that the IANA registry is consistent with
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
> [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
> Mathieu Goessens
> Sent: 25 March 2011 21:33
> To: Paul Hoffman
> Cc: 6lowpan(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> Subject: Re: Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and
> datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor
>
> On 25/03/2011 20:12, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Goessens wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by
tools.ietf.org
> and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org.
> > > The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version:
> > >
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
> > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
> > >
> > > Do you know what is the problem ? Document generation problem ? Where it
> should be reported ?
> > >
> > These two documents were clearly derived from very different sources: the
> page breaks are also quite different.
> > How on earth did that happen
> I am not that sure: the page break is different precisely starting from
> this figure.
>
> I was more thinking about a different version of configuration of the
> xml2rfc software.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Mathieu Goessens
> IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France
> Tel: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 00, Fax: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 71
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf