Thanks for the review. I've modified the draft according to your comments.
Please see inline for more details.
BR,
Pierrick
-----Message d'origine-----
De : SM [mailto:sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net]
Envoyé : lundi 25 avril 2011 16:31
À : ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc : Margaret Wasserman; SEITE Pierrick RD-RESA-REN
Objet : Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-09.txt> (Current
Practices for Multiple Interface Hosts) to Informational RFC
At 09:38 28-03-2011, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Multiple Interfaces WG (mif) to
consider the following document:
- 'Current Practices for Multiple Interface Hosts'
<draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-09.txt> as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2011-04-11. Exceptionally,
comments may be
I missed the Last Call deadline. This I-D is worth reading if the
person is interested in multiple-interface solutions implemented in
some widely used operating systems.
In Section 2.3.1:
"On hosts with per-interface DNS server lists, different mechanisms
are used to determine which DNS server is contacted for a given
query. In most cases, the first DNS server listed on the "primary"
interface is queried first, with back off to other servers if an
answer is not received."
This can result in the application trying to connect to the wrong
destination node (Section 4.1 of draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-13).
In Section 3.1.3:
"Depending on the network configuration, applications in reasearch In
Motion (RIM) BlackBerry devices [BLACKBERRY] can use can use direct
TCP/IP connectivity or different application proxys to establish
connections over the wireless network."
There is a typo for "Research". See also "can use".
Thanks.
In Section 3.2.1.3:
"Windows uses a host-wide "effective" server list for an actual query,
where the effective server list may be different for different names.
In the list of DNS server addresses, the first server is considered
the "primary" server, with all other servers being secondary."
I suggest using "preferred" and avoid "primary" or "secondary" when
discussing DNS servers in this context.
I see your point, but the section describes the behaviour of a particular OS
and "primary" or "secondary" is the terminology used by this OS.
In Section 3.2.1.3:
"The Internet Systems Consortium (ISC) DHCP Client [ISCDHCP] and its
derivative for OpenBSD [OPENBSDDHCLIENT] can be configured with
specific instructions for each interface. However, each time new
configuration data is received by the host from a DHCP server,
regardless of which interface it is received on, the DHCP client
rewrites the global configuration data, such as the default routes
and the DNS server list (in /etc/resolv.conf) with the most recent
information received. Therefore, the last configured interface
always become the primary one. The ISC DHCPv6 client behaves
similarly.:
That rewrite can be overridden for OpenBSD dhclient (
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#DHCPclient ).
Good point, I've modified the draft accordingly. Thanks.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf