ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Minimum Implementation Requirements (Was: 2119bis)

2011-09-01 15:00:23
On 2011-09-02 07:45, Melinda Shore wrote:
...
Can anybody point to an incident in which lack of clarity around
2119 language caused problems, and it was determined that 2119
itself was the problem and not authors or editors being careless?

(or implementors being careless)

Indeed. I'm in favour of leaving "good enough" alone and not striving
for perfection, which is impossible anyway.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf