ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [websec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-websec-origin-04.txt> (The Web Origin Concept) to Proposed Standard

2011-09-02 10:39:12
I replied to Julian's message on a W3C list.  Julian, is there more
discussion you'd like to have about these points?

Adam


On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Julian Reschke 
<julian(_dot_)reschke(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de> wrote:
Below a few late comments..

6. Serializing Origins

- It really really seems that the two algorithms need to be swapped (the
first one converts to ASCII, but the second does not).

- Also, I'd prefer a declarative definition.

7. The HTTP Origin header

- header *field*

- the syntax doesn't allow multiple header fields, and the prose says
clients MUST NOT generate them; what is the recipient supposed to do when it
get's multiple instances anyway? Is the default approach (ignoring them all)
good enough? Do we need to warn recipients so that they check?

11. References

- the WEBSOCKETS reference should be updated (if a new draft is produced)

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
websec(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>