+1. I like that phrasing. It summarizes the requirements document pretty
well
Yet it never was worded that way when this WG started debating mainly WS. In
fact, I don't recall any other protocol being discussed on this board so I
disagree with the term "requirement" in this very case.
--
- Sylvain
http://www.defuze.org
http://twitter.com/lawouach
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf