I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-websec-origin-04.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel(_dot_)a(_dot_)garcia(_at_)ericsson(_dot_)com>
Review Date: 2011-09-05
IETF LC End Date: 2011-09-06
Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standards track RFC.
Nits/editorial comments:
- General: In many places of the document the text speaks about an "HTTP
header". I think it is more accepted to refer to "HTTP header *field*".
This is the terminology widely used in RFC 2616.
- First paragraph in Section 3.3, add a formal reference to RFC 3986 when
thzt RFC is mentioned.
- Second paragraph in Section 3.4.1:
s/sample/example
- Section 4, bullet point #5 speaks of "idna-canonicalized form". I think
it would be nice to have a formal reference to a proper document. Is this
reference RFC 3490, RFC 5890, or another one?
- Section 10.1. There is a strange way to refer to "Unicode Technical
Standard #46". I think it should be promoted to a regular reference,
similar to how [Unicode52] is referred to. So, perhaps this should become
[Unicode46].
/Miguel
--
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf